Reclaiming the Global Climate Narrative – with Marc Morano – [Ep. 279]

Linda J. Hansen:  Thank you for tuning in today. My name is Linda J. Hansen, your host of the Prosperity 101® Podcast, where we seek to unleash the power of employers to reclaim and preserve America by Connecting Boardroom to Breakroom® and policy to paycheck. Employers educating employees about public policy issues that affect their jobs can lead to greater employee loyalty, engagement, and retention, and to an increased awareness of the blessings and responsibilities of living in a free society. 

We help people understand the foundations of true prosperity, the policies of prosperity, and how to protect prosperity by Becoming Informed, Involved, and Impactful®. To access our podcast library and resources, or to sign our Employers Unleashed™ Pledge, visit Prosperity101.com.

Thank you so much for tuning in today. It is always a pleasure to have you join us. And today, like so many days, I have a wonderful guest, but before I introduce the guest, I want to just invite you to go to our website, Prosperity101.com, where you can see our new Employers Unleashed™ pledge. We have a three point pledge on there where you express your support for the Judeo-Christian values that made America great. You express your support for promoting those values.

And you say that you will share one thing in your workplace to help other people understand how important it is to support the values that made America great. So we want to protect freedom and true prosperity, which is human flourishing and freedom. So thank you for tuning in to the Prosperity 101® podcast.

And today I would like to welcome our guest. Marc Marano is an award winning author. He manages the ClimateDepot.com news and information service. But also the most recent book that I think you want to read, make sure you get this, is called The Great Reset, Global Elites and the Permanent Lockdown. When I want to talk about what's happening in the global elite world and climate and other climate hysteria, I always look to Marc Marano because he's become a trusted voice to me and I know he will be to you as well. So Marc, thank you for joining with the podcast again.

Marc Morano: Thank you, Linda. Happy to be here.

Linda J. Hansen: Yeah, I love listening and reading your work because you bring insights that aren't always in the mainstream media, obviously. But I know that this is something you have studied for years and years and years. I invited you back on the podcast because there was so much news surrounding the World Economic Forum event in Davos recently and how much the climate agenda has shifted with the global elites and the whole you'll eat bugs and own nothing and be happy agenda.

I know that you were there and you had some great insights. So first, before you go into that, if you just want to share with the listeners who maybe have never heard of you or know anything about you other than my brief and incomplete introduction, maybe just share a little bit about how you got to where you are, why you do it, and then we can go into what happened at Davos.

Marc Morano: Well, I mean, I've been a journalist for thirty five years or so, and I actually started with Rush Limbaugh, the television show. I was his correspondent in Washington. Our man in Washington, as Rush used to call it. I covered the whole D.C. political scene, was very humorous and had a lot of fun doing it, wore a hat, trench coat, went undercover, got thrown out, had my camera seized at the Clinton White House. 

Then I worked for a show called American Investigator, which was like a 60 minutes news style show and did a lot of environmental reporting, investigating the wetlands and or even organic food practices and also endangered species and a whole series of other videos.

Then I worked for Cybercast News Service and then I went to work for the U.S. Senate. It was while in the U.S. Senate that I started really focusing on global warming. That was back 20-30 years ago and started global warming about 25 years ago. I started interviewing scientists, but I started going to the U.N. conferences. I've been to 22 out of the last 24 U.N. climate summits around the world, everywhere, from Bali, Indonesia to Kenya to South Africa, to Azerbaijani, to Argentina, to Brazil, to Egypt and throughout the Middle East and all over Europe. And so I focused on that climate agenda.

And also, as part of that, the World Economic Forum merged the climate agenda with the public health agenda back in 2020, if you recall, and issued a call for the Great Reset, Build Back Better, which everyone was parroting. And so that's what it brings. I have a website called ClimateDepot.com, which is daily news and coverage on the climate, energy, environment, Great Reset, et cetera.

Linda J. Hansen: It's such a great career. And for those of us who are old enough to remember some of the things that we talk about, like you in a trench coat with Rush Limbaugh and things, it's great. So this is something that you haven't come upon lightly. It's something you've been studying for a long time. You've seen the trends in every direction. You understand the players.

And I think your insight into this year's World Economic Forum summit, I think, is just so incredible because you've seen a real shift. First, could you tell us what, for people who maybe don't even know what we're talking about, when we talk about the climate summits that they've had at these forums, can you explain a little bit about what their agenda was? 

I mean, we've all heard global warming. We've heard climate change and things, but explain a little bit on that. And then what was the big shift this year? And I know we need to discuss, too, the Trump administration 1.0 versus Trump administration 2.0. So let's help guide the listener to that point.

Marc Morano: Well, without even getting into the science, the idea that mankind is driving a catastrophe, let's set that aside. In 1988, the United Nations formed their climate panel, and this was the claim. And they were essentially a scientific panel handpicked by governments around the world with a vested interest in the solutions to this alleged crisis.

So in 1988, the UN decided to have a climate panel that had to toe the line that carbon dioxide was creating a climate catastrophe. And guess what? As a bonus, the UN got to also be in charge of the solution, which meant annual United Nations climate summits all around the world.

So what happened was the UN became a self-serving lobbying organization on climate. In other words, if they found climate wasn't going to cause a catastrophe, they'd fail to have a reason to have their climate panel and their meetings and their funding. And then they would also fail to have these annual summits and the solution.

And they'd be in charge of global taxes and everything else. We just saw the Trump administration kill the global shipping tax earlier in 2025 in the fall. So that's the con of the UN.

It's just a lobbying organization that pretends to be this distinguished scientific panel. It's called the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Anyway, long story short, George H.W. Bush gets us into this whole mess of the UN climate summits. He signs a 1992 treaty, which then gets the US involved, leads to Copenhagen agreements, leads to Kyoto Protocol, leads ultimately to the Paris agreement. And the US is now tied up in doing all this UN crap with sustainable development and net zero and Green New Deal and all these restrictions and banning cars and limiting meat eating and all that. So fast forwarding all of that, you had the World Economic Forum.

When COVID hit in 2020, Klaus Schwab, the then chairman, announced with glee that this was a great opportunity. He saw he had many climate activists just openly say the quiet part out loud. If the world can shut down for a virus, we can do the same thing for climate.

And it was person after person after person. John Kerry, the climate envoy, was a former climate envoy under Obama, was literally saying, these are the same one and the same things and the same solution. And they love the fact that the Western world took a page from one party ruled China and literally decided no votes of anyone in office.

We were going to have unelected bureaucrats dictate every aspect of our life. And that's not an exaggeration. Weddings canceled, funerals canceled, medical procedures canceled, school canceled, jobs canceled, stay at home orders issued, vaccine mandates, mask mandates, travel restrictions.

And this filled the World Economic Forum, which had been founded in the 1970s of the global elite of the world, the ruling class, essentially. It filled them with such hope and optimism because the world, unfortunately, we went along.

I think, had Hillary Clinton been president in 2020, I think there would have been a greater rebellion. But sadly, it's one of Donald Trump's big mistakes of his first term was going along with Deborah Birx and Anthony Fauci and allowing… remember the two weeks to slow the spread, it was a con. And we know this because the health officials wrote about it.

Deborah Birx actually wrote about how they were going to trick Trump into going along with it. And they were very proud of themselves for that. So that's when they announced the World Economic Forum, the Great Reset. And this was the Great Reset. You'll owe nothing and be happy. Meat will be a rare treat. Everything you want will be delivered at your house. You'll have no privacy. We'll become useless eaters as AI takes over and automation.

And we're going to need psychotropic drugs and video games that dull the masses who are going to have no jobs and essentially be forced to stay at home. They love this. There were so many people praising, oh, look at that emissions are down. All the recessions hitting everyone, economic growth.

This is exactly what they'd called for. So that's what happened. And so we went through years of this with the World Economic Forum, every world leader from Biden to UK prime ministers, Justin Trudeau, all saying build back better.

The Great Reset is here. Al Gore, John Kerry. And one man, the movement, I should say, Donald Trump, because he did something no other Republican had done and he started doing it back in 2015, he reframed the climate debate.

In other words, you could have George H.W. Bush, who signed the Rio Earth Summit, they always wanted to appear green. They never wanted to offend. They wanted to be, oh, me too, me too. But we don't want to go as fast as Al Gore. But we all agree with him. We all want cleaner.

Donald Trump came in and said environmentalism is one thing, but climate is a con. It's a scam. It's a religion. It's a cult. And he started that in his first term. But all of his appointees were very careful and never really challenged the status quo.

Well, I think because he lost the election and I will say, aside from voter fraud, Donald Trump really toppled his whole first term by going along with that two weeks to flatten the spread. Anyway, long story short, Donald Trump doesn't get reelected for whatever reason. And then all the prosecutions, he gets a huge populist surge of supporters and he comes in 2.0 like gangbusters. And this is important to what happened in Davos which is why I'm setting this up. He came in with 250 actions thus far in one year, dismantling the climate, energy, net zero, Green New Deal, Inflation Reduction Act, UN, the entire agenda has been just dismantled. But he's done the most important thing is he's reframed the narrative because he's reframed the narrative. Words are powerful. Language is powerful. 

It's not just Donald Trump. It's his energy secretary, Chris Wright. It's his EPA director, Lee Zeldin. Lee Zeldin uses words like scam, cult, religion routinely as the EPA environmental protection when he describes climate change.

That has been so important that now even the CNN pollster is saying because of the shift in narrative, there are less people. We're at the same levels of people concerned in the U.S. about climate change as we were in the 1980s, the late 1980s, when they first started asking these questions. And that goes to show you how important narrative is.

And that's what Trump 1.0 didn't really do. I mean, sure, Trump was at a rally or in 60 minutes, he might make a couple of comments, but this was a sustained narrative change that telling the world that you've been conned. This is a hoax.

This is a scam. And it's what climate skeptics like myself have been saying. I wrote The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change. I also wrote Green Fraud, Why the Green New Deal is Worse Than You Think. And it's what we've been screaming all along. And particularly me, as I was a former communication director in the U.S. Senate, as a speechwriter for Senator James Inhofe, this is where you change hearts and minds. You've got to reframe the debate. This is why people like Rush Limbaugh were so powerful. This is why great orators are so powerful, because they move public opinion.

And that's what's happened. But Donald Trump did something even more significant. First of all, he had luck on his side because it was a huge shift post-COVID and also deep enough into this.

Remember, the climate scare legislatively, it started in the late 80s in terms of a scare. Then they started infrastructure. But, you had Arnold Schwarzenegger, even in 2005, we're going to do the climate bill. And he was praised as an environmental hero. Meanwhile, California, none of the policies he was advocating were even implemented yet. Fast forward, 2015, 2020.

By 2024, the world had seen, I'm talking Europe, Canada, Australia, the Western world particularly, had seen what a fraud, the lies of solar and wind, all the subsidies, still less than five percent of our energy, less than 15 percent of the electricity, despite all the mandate subsidies, trying to ban the competition. EV promises, half a million pounds of material dug up in China to make one thousand pound Tesla battery. But these are the green cars. Oh, and we'll ship them across sea and we'll recharge them on a fossil fuel grid. And then, of course, let's not talk about the recycling of it. But these are the green cars.

Bull bleep from beginning to end. Anyway, Donald Trump comes in and he's presiding over the collapse of the climate agenda globally. Europe doesn't want any part of it. Some of the 80 countries didn't even submit their climate targets by the time the COP 30 U.N. Climate Summit began in Brazil, which I attended. All of that happened. Donald Trump comes in, does 250 actions.

The U.S. Congress is now following up, which is surprising, but it's good. They legislatively killed this gas powered car ban for the future. They've followed up on defunding the solar and wind mandates of the Inflation Reduction Act. And they've done an amazing job with all that. 

So all of this is happening globally. The farmers in Europe revolting, throwing manure on the gates of the entrance of the EU building in Brussels, which I've been to, and no building better in the world that deserves manure thrown on it than the EU headquarters.

And you had farmers across Europe. They had big elections there in 2024 where they reversed a lot of the Green New Deal candidates. You have skepticism growing in Germany and France and the UK.

I met Nigel Farage when I was in Davos. Anyway, long story short, I haven't even gotten to Davos yet. But the point of this being Donald Trump presided over, he gave an incredible speech in September, basically saying, all you world leaders, Western leaders in particular, you've been conned, scammed. The UN is a hoax. And it was just unbelievable. And there's been no pushback in the US. You're not hearing from AOC. You're not hearing from Nancy Pelosi. The only person who really seems to care, and I give him credit for caring, is Al Gore.

Now, it could just be because he's a grift and wanted the money. But I think he's a true believer. He's the only person still holding the narrative. And when I say that, Jeff Bezos, major climate funder, he's now writing Washington Post editorial board, to the extent there's still a paper he's laid off most of the climate reporters, now writing Washington Post editorial boards, not some op-ed writer, writing editorial boards, dismantling the entire Green New Deal, going after the net zero, going after the E.V. mandates, attacking Biden's policies.

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, the number one funder. Funding Harvard University to block the sun so we could cool the air, geoengineer the climate. Bill Gates at every U.N. climate summit, Bill Gates funding all of these media outlets. He's now saying climate's not a catastrophe. Climate, we need human flourishing instead. He's now funding Bjorn Lomborg, the global warming skeptic in England. Al Gore is now attacking Bill Gates at a U.N. climate summit. So that's the backdrop. 

And we have Bezos this year in January. This is the annual meeting. And what they have at these meetings, and they've been doing it for decades since 1972, I believe, was the original year it started, well, they started the organization.This is the ruling class. This is the best and brightest. This is the Ivy League. This is the corporate CEOs.

These are the millionaires and the billionaires. These are the mid-level bureaucrats. These are the higher level bureaucrats. These are the prime ministers and presidents and in royal families. And these are the Hollywood celebrities, the oligarchs. They all meet every year and they've been doing this for decades and they plot how they're going to do central bank digital currency.

And the way to look at this, just to understand the true perspective of Davos, is for thousands of years of human civilization, the ruling class has always tried to come up with reasons why the rest of us can't be free. It's usually involving a crisis, war, terrorism, climate, a virus, whatever it is, they're going to have to bypass neutral democracy, declare an emergency. And this is when throughout human history, going back to the Roman Empire, through the Middle Ages, through 1930s Germany, the greatest violations of human rights have occurred during these times of crises that our ruling class has declared.

And so that's what the World Economic Forum's purpose was to always come up with reasons why we can't be free. And they were really good at it, really, really good at it. I got to give them credit for that.

And it was sad because many so-called conservatives would go and they would go along with it and they would go. It's very sad, the uniparty situation we have in Washington. But anyway, what we had this year, everything changed.

They did a survey ahead of time, first of all, and climate change had dropped near the bottom of even those attending the World Economic Forum. Climate dropped off the list in terms of speakers, everything else. The only speaker that I'm aware of of any high profile, they had little panels, which I'll mention in a second, but was Al Gore.

Al Gore was there talking about climate migrants, millions of climate immigrants and all the nonsense. He could have said the same speech in 2010, 2015, 2020. Nothing's changed for Al Gore. But what has changed is he got no media coverage. No one cared. International media.

Until Gore's highest media point, I'm not making this up, Al Gore was reduced to heckling speakers at the World Economic Forum. In this case, it was Trump's commerce secretary. He was booing him and audibly, verbally heckling him from the audience. He wasn't like on a panel with him. This was just Al Gore at the event. That's how frustrating it was.

The man who coined the term or started the whole Great Reset is long gone. The World Economic Forum booted out Klaus Schwab. Why? Because they ostensibly claimed, oh, he had a big expense bill at hotels. I'm sorry, what? They got rid of him because he was the vilification of the evil Bond villain.

And they knew they had to have a new page. So as such, they bring in Larry Fink, the BlackRock CEO, as the co-chair. Larry Fink now openly admits at these meetings, solar and wind can't power AI, solar and wind, we need fossil fuels.

Larry Fink is now saying we did some overreach. He started trying to walk back the whole Great Reset agenda. And Donald Trump, through a masterclass of diplomacy, completely hijacked the meeting.

The whole thing became about, is Donald Trump going to annex Greenland or what's he going to do? World leaders were talking about an intervention at one point with Macron leading it. They were going to sit Donald Trump down and bring his first grade teacher in or something to take him into rehab or something.

But none of that happened. Donald Trump came, took over the meeting. Not only he did, but he had Howard Lutnick and he had Scott Besant, his treasury secretary, give unbelievable speeches, just trashing Europe for going along with net zero.

His commerce secretary in particular told the European leaders there, why would you ever go along with net zero when your industrial base has collapsed? You don't even make your own battery and you're going to make China wealthier, just going on and on. It was unbelievable.

I mean, you can't take these words back. Meaning, I know people say, oh, it's bureaucrat, it's rhetoric, it doesn't mean anything. It means a ton because people hear it, they absorb it. That's why narrative control is so important. You can't think of Covid. They couldn't impose all of the things I just mentioned without a vote unless people were scared, scared as hell of it. That's why the narrative, the narrative was you're going to die. You're a grandma killer if you don't wear a mask, etc. That is how you move.

I mean, that and military force is how you move. But even military force at some level, you've got to have a narrative or propaganda level. You kill one person to scare the 80 million people who might see the one person die.

There's a whole technique with leaders. But anyway, that's what happened in Davos. The first time I got to go in person, I also attended the Climate Hub, which was fascinating because they decided to go stealth on climate.

They're still there, but they're going through this financialization in nature. They had a whole seminar and I attended that and sat in and listened. They're basically talking about every tree, lake, forest, body of water, pond, creek is going to be assigned a sort of ESG score, environment, social governance or a banking score.

And international banks are going to basically have the right. And this is in conjunction with these environmental groups suing on behalf of a forest or a river because they believe the river's rights are being violated by development or putting in a dam. And so this is where they want to go.

A boring bureaucratic financialization sort of of the climate scare below the radar. And that's the key thing there. And they're also still talking about the merging of climate into public health and we're dealing with that. We have doctors, medical toolkits, climate toolkits. We have calls to put climate as the death certificate as a cause of death.

Doctors in Canada are already diagnosing patients with climate suffering from climate change. If you have heat stroke. So they also want to have these heatwave death tolls very similar to COVID and this was happening under Biden.

I'm not sure if Trump has actually gotten rid of that. But the idea would be that once you have death tolls and they named winter storm Fern, which I'm here in Virginia, which I'm not comfortable with that because then you get, oh, well, Fern had this kind of death toll and they're going to treat him like hurricanes, a snowstorm.

I can understand that scientifically, but I'm also aware of how they manipulate that scientifically. So a future Gavin Newsom administration could literally turn this into look at this, we had this many people die in that winter storm, this many people die in that heatwave. Look at the climate death toll. And there's like a COVID death toll in the corner of your screen. So this is all there's a lot that could come back.

But what makes it so hard is that Donald Trump changed the narrative. The World Economic Forum is in full retreat. The U.N. is just in full failure mode. I mean, they're not retreating, but they're in full failure. The head of the U.N., secretary general, just says the same old crap. I mean, absurd stuff like this is the climate emergency. We're in it. He's the former head of Socialist International. So he's just peddling his wares but no one's paying attention.

But you always have to pay attention to what they can do behind the scenes. And that's why things like the financialization nature, all these U.N. there's a sale of shipping tax they were just trying to pass. Donald Trump, they were able to stop.

There's now some other tax coming up that they're going to do to try to stop that as well. And these are things that we've signed under Democrat presidents in particular that we're sort of obligated to, that we would actually have to pay. And it's again, the U.N. has a climate slush fund. They transfer this money to the leaders in Africa and the developing world, South America, who are best able to keep their citizens locked in poverty. In other words, if you have poor economic growth and very low development, the U.N. is going to give you a lot of money, pat you on the back and say you're doing it right. And then you get all that money.

You can enrich your friends, campaign contributions. You can build stadiums, monuments to yourself, whatever you want to do. Those who that's who the U.N. rewards because they see economic growth, prosperity, human flourishing as the enemy of the climate. So sorry about that. That was a long question.

Linda J. Hansen: That's OK. It's great. You got it all in.

It's like we didn't have to waste time with me asking you the next question. But it's really good. And, the thing about it, I think that people don't understand. We've really gotten used to hearing like the United Nations or the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization, all these things sound so great. But if you look under the hood, there's a lot of problems in terms of our freedoms and our ability to flourish. And in fact, the ability to really take care of the environment the way that we know to do.

I mean, just think of this as a whole nother episode we could discuss. But, farming practices and things like that, taking care of the soil, all these things that they try to have us do. And like you mentioned, the farmers that rioted in Europe and or protested, they didn't really riot, but they protested.

And, we can see that there's a lot of common sense lacking. But now that there's all these big data centers that are being built and there's this new energy, all of a sudden they seem to be waking up. I mean, for years and years and years, I have worked with a nonprofit that promoted the use of small modular reactors, nuclear reactors, especially molten salt reactors.

And what we can do when we have reliable, clean energy such as nuclear in these these new reactors that are safe and affordable and things for years working on that, working on different energy sources like thorium, working on this. And now all of a sudden it's like, oh, they need more power for what they want to do with AI and everything. And now, oh, climate, it's not that big a deal.

I would say just follow the money and their opinions. But just for those in the audience that are younger, I think we should just touch on the fact that when we were growing up, I'm not sure your age, but when we were growing up, maybe you remember the world was going to be too cold. We were all going to freeze to death.

That was the big scare is, we were all going to freeze to death. And then all of a sudden it turned to, oh, no, it's going to be too hot, and it was global freezing, global warming. And now they just call it climate because they can't decide, and all the data doesn't cover everything.

Marc Morano: A heat wave in New York Times is saying the record cold we've had in the U.S. is climate change.

Linda J. Hansen: Yeah, of course, and they just need to live longer and realize that, lots of years are cold and some years are hot and it just all balances out. I think it's very important, too, that we look at the fact that Trump has brought in a lot of good executive orders and has pulled us out of these treaties that have been so harmful or these agreements that have been so harmful.

But we really need to put pressure on Congress to say we need those things codified into law so that if a new president comes in, we still aren't going to go backwards into this globalist agenda where we can't have the light bulbs we want or we can't have a dishwasher that washes dishes or these things that have been problematic in terms of regulatory restrictions.

And so along with that, that's where I say to employers, it's important to help employees understand how much all of this affects their job, affects manufacturing, affects the ability to grow businesses, the ability to grow communities, the ability to pay paychecks. So what would you say to employers who need to educate employees about these issues?

Marc Morano: Well, I would tell them to look at the proposed solutions. You don't get in a scientific debate, but you look at it even like the restrictions on movement.

Like for instance, in Europe, parts of Europe are banning flights two and a half hours or less, people can't fly. There's no restrictions on private jets. Look at the people who are promoting the idea of climate restrictions, are they following it?

Were the Bill Gates and Al Gore's of the world, these are people living in private jets in multiple mansions, traveling around the world, doing what John Kerry said, flying to win an environmental award at a private jet, saying, do you know who I am? I'm the most important person. So when the people promoting the solution aren't willing to follow any of the actual solutions, then you know there's something rotten there.

And also they just need to basically know that throughout history, people have used these scares to try to get us to move in certain directions. And all you have to do is ask simple questions like, assuming we did all the solutions that have been proposed, what would happen? And analysis has shown that even if the UN got everything they wanted, even if you believe their climate claims, you would have no change in temperature a hundred years from now, no perceptible change in temperature a hundred years from now, assuming the UN was right in the science and assuming all the nations followed it.

So it was just a big con for the beginning. And the idea would be if we did face a climate emergency and we had to rely on the Green New Deal and the United Nations to save us, we'd all be doomed. So it's not about the climate, it's about controlling the economy and controlling you, your freedom of movement, your diet.

I mean, the net zero was very simple. It was a collapse of modern agriculture through all these restrictions, particularly methane, which was gonna restrict our food supply, force us into eating bugs and lab-grown meat.

And then secondly, it was gonna restrict our freedom of movement, flight bans, CNN, carbon passports, taxes making flights more expensive. And then of course, cars are gonna be restricted a la Cuba. The idea would be only electric cars, which mean only the elite, only, by the way, the wealthiest can buy the electric cars.

Most of the 7% of all electric cars, not most, but a lot of it was wealthy people buying a second car that was electric, not a primary car. So that, and of course, the collapse of just the economy in general, planned recessions to fight global warming. They wanted everyone poorer so the government could then be more in charge and you'd be more reliant and thus more compliant, more compliant with whatever they want, which is why they loved COVID again, because it collapsed the economy, it collapsed the whole social structure, couldn't even really communicate except online.

And then of course they started what they do online, immediately started a mass increase in censorship online. You couldn't even question on mask effectiveness, even though the CDC was on record for decades saying masks don't work, so yeah, just one small example.

Linda J. Hansen: Right, that's great. Well, and for my audience too, I just wanna invite you with the whole concept of employers, educating employees about the public policy issues that affect their jobs. In addition to having this three point pledge that I mentioned at the beginning of the broadcast, I also have a webinar series on reclaiming the mountains of culture and the seven mountains of culture like business, family, media, arts and entertainment, government and military, education, and religion, and reclaiming those mountains of culture with common sense and the values and principles that made our nation great, the Judeo-Christian principles that made our nation great. Of course, we'll be covering the media mountain, which I love what you said at the beginning of our interview, you talked about how important it is for us to have a narrative that helps to educate people. 

You've just gone through so many times where these climate change leaders have had a narrative, it didn't matter if it was true or not, but they had a narrative that convinced people. So how much better for those of us who can say, we actually have truth and we want you to be free. Let's take back that mountain of media and control the narrative when it comes to this issue too. So business owners, you can do that and please join me, reach out to me and you can be part of that webinar where we can talk about what you can do in your business to help reclaim that mountain and control the narrative.

So do you have any other closing comments before we close and let people know how to contact you?

Marc Morano: No, I was just gonna say, this really is the low point for the climate change movement. However, it's been decades of billionaire funding and corporate funding and media and academia, so don't expect it to go away. Expect it to go stealth, expect it to lie low and expect it to be resurrected one day.

Linda J. Hansen: Yes, it'll be resurrected under a new name.

Marc Morano: Yes.

Linda J. Hansen: Absolutely. Well, please give people your contact information, how to follow you and learn more about what you do. And I just, thank you so much.

Marc Morano: Thank you. Okay, it's climatedepot.com. I'm on X or Twitter @Climate Depot. Also, my book, A Great Reset, Global Leads in the Permanent Lockdown. And also I did a movie, two movies, Climate Hustle 1, Climate Hustle 2. Climate Hustle 2 was the most recent and featured Kevin Sorbo narrating, and that's available at climatehustle.com, by the way. So that's a fun movie to watch. It goes through the religious aspects of climate and also the children's indoctrination and the whole agenda.

Linda J. Hansen: The whole thing, it's very worthwhile. So thank you so much for doing all of that. And for your lifetime of really helping to get truth out.

So thank you. Look forward to having you back again.

Marc Morano: All right, thank you, Linda.

Linda J. Hansen: Appreciate it. Okay, thank you. Bye.

Thank you again for tuning in to this episode of the Prosperity 101 podcast. If you’ve enjoyed this episode, please, subscribe, share, and give us a great review. Don’t forget to visit Prosperity101.com to sign our Employers Unleashed™ pledge, to access our entire podcast library, or to discover resources for use in your workplace. Let us know how we can serve you. Contact us today at Prosperity101.com.